The Hidden Environmental and Human Costs of the Sochi Olympics
Alec Luhn - The
Nation
Illegal waste dumps, displacement of
residents, harsh retribution against local activists: Sochi has it
all.
The sochi olympics are already infamous for being the most expensive in
history. But corruption-inflated construction contracts aside, there is also a
huge environmental and human cost to building the Games from scratch, at
breakneck speed. It can’t be calculated in a single figure, but it’s found in
places like the Sochi-area village of Uch-Dere, where smoke from underground
fires pours out of a sprawling construction waste dump polluting the neighboring
river; in the village of Akhshtyr, where limestone quarrying has dried up the
wells and covered residents’ fruit in dust; and in the village of Vesyoloye,
where construction waste dumping triggered a landslide that ruined homes. The
activists who try to fight these abuses have been harassed, jailed and, in the
case of at least one environmentalist, looking at prison time.
“The Russian government took on an obligation to protect the environment
and it didn’t fulfill it, along with many other obligations to the residents of
Sochi. That’s the worst part,” says Yevgeny Vitishko, an activist with
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC). In its Sochi bid, Russia pledged
to hold the cleanest Olympic Games ever under a “Zero Waste” program, a promise
that now rings hollow.
Much has been made of the fact that the Winter Olympics will be held in
subtropical Sochi, which stretches ninety miles along the Black Sea in Russia’s
warmest region. Despite having virtually no stadiums or ski hills, the location
was championed by President Vladimir Putin, who has staked his reputation on the
Games’ success. Nearly everything was built from scratch, at tremendous cost.
Besides its warm climate, the Sochi area is known for its ecological
richness and diversity. In 1999, UNESCO declared the Caucasus State Biosphere
Nature Reserve and parts of the Sochi National Park a world heritage site,
noting natural phenomena including caves, high-altitude lakes, rivers,
waterfalls, and abundant flora and fauna. Many types of orchids have been
cataloged here, and dolphins are a common sight along the beaches.
But the Worldwide Fund for Nature Russia, Greenpeace Russia, EWNC and
others have been warning of the harmful ecological effects of Olympic
preparations, including recent legislative changes easing regulations on
construction in environmentally protected areas. “We thought that the Games were
inappropriate in the places they chose,” Vitishko says.
The coastal cluster of venues was built atop the Imeretinskaya Lowland,
renowned for its rich bird life. With the start of Olympic building, much of it
was filled in with construction waste, and now the 40,000-seat Fisht Olympic
Stadium, which will host only the opening and closing ceremonies, sits in the
lowland.
Meanwhile, EWNC activist Vladimir Kimayev says the group has found eight
quarries of questionable legality around Sochi, including limestone quarries in
Sochi National Park that the prosecutor general confirmed had partially filled
in a stretch of the Psou River. In a 2011 letter, the prosecutor general’s
office said it had brought charges over two illegal quarries there. One was
operated by state-owned Russian Railways on land rented by the state Olympic
construction company Olympstroy, as part of the highway and railroad project
Russian Railways was building between the coastal and mountain clusters. As of
mid-January, these quarries were still operating, according to Kimayev.
EWNC also knows of 1,500 unsanctioned waste dumps around Sochi, of which
about two dozen are large-scale, and has been able to document four illegal
dumps receiving Olympic construction waste, Kimayev says.
* * *
Despite promises from the mayor of Sochi and the head of Olympstroy that
“not one resident” of Sochi would suffer in the lead-up to the Games, Human
Rights Watch estimates that about 2,000 families have been displaced. Although
most received compensation, HRW says that many were under-compensated for the
loss of their homes and the income they had earned growing vegetables or renting
rooms. Others were not compensated at all, including Andrei Martynov and Natalya
Martynova, who like many had never been able to obtain the proper documentation
for the land they had lived on near the beach since 2005. After a long legal
battle, their home was bulldozed to make way for the coastal cluster. The pair
now share a room in a Soviet-era hotel.
“We don’t want to be homeless…but no one wants to help us. No one wants to
help us as fellow human beings,” Natalya told The Nation. “We don’t know how
we’re going to live in the future.”
The unfortunate poster child of Olympic destruction is the village of
Akhshtyr, in the hills above Sochi. According to locals, the opening of two
limestone quarries, a construction dump and a road caused their wells to run dry
five years ago, leaving them dependent on semiweekly water deliveries. The
village road was paved for a near-constant stream of dump trucks, one of which
struck and killed an area man, locals say. Thick dust churned up by the trucks
covers the fruit in the orchards, making it unfit for sale and depriving many of
a key source of income, including resident Alexander Koropov. He and others say
they can’t sell their houses because of Olympic preparations. “I curse the
Olympics because I became poor. I became an Olympic bum,” Koropov says.
This article appeared
in the February 10, 2014 edition of The Nation
Article, courstesy of THe OTHER NEWS initiatives.
Hakuna maoni:
Chapisha Maoni